Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, Helen
dc.contributor.authorLinke, Barbara S.
dc.contributor.authorMuránsky, Ondrej
dc.contributor.authorHamelin, Cory
dc.contributor.authorHill, Michael R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T22:13:15Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T22:13:15Z
dc.date.copyright5/22/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0094-4289
dc.identifier.othermats_142_4_041005.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4275122
dc.description.abstractStress corrosion cracking (SCC) behavior is a matter of concern for structural materials, namely, stainless steels and nickel alloys, in nuclear power plants. High levels of cold work (CW) have shown to both reduce crack initiation times and increase crack growth rates. Cold working has numerous effects on a material, including changes in microstructure, mechanical properties, and residual stress state, yet it is typically reported as a simple percent change in geometry. There is need to develop a strategy for quantitative assessment of cold-work level in order to better understand stress corrosion cracking test data. Five assessment techniques, commonly performed alongside stress corrosion cracking testing (optical microscopy (OM), electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), X-ray diffraction (XRD), tensile testing, and hardness testing) are evaluated with respect to their ability to quantify the level of CW in a component. The test material is stainless steel 316L that has been cold-rolled to three conditions: 0%, 20%, and 30% CW. Measurement results for each assessment method include correlation with CW condition and repeatability data. Measured values showed significant spatial variation, illustrating that CW level is not uniform throughout a component. Mechanical properties (tensile testing, hardness) were found to correlate most linearly with the amount of imparted CW.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleAssessment of Mechanical Properties and Microstructure Characterizing Techniques in Their Ability to Quantify Amount of Cold Work in 316L Alloy
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume142
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4047024
dc.journal.fristpage041005-1
dc.journal.lastpage041005-12
dc.page12
dc.treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record