Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorXiong, Hui
dc.contributor.authorSun, Liaoxin
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T21:56:52Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T21:56:52Z
dc.date.copyright6/4/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1043-7398
dc.identifier.otherep_142_04_041101.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4274581
dc.description.abstractIn this work, we present the design method of diffractive beam splitters via two comparative technical routes, the first referred as the direct scheme and the second referred as the indirect scheme. Comparative study is carried on the design procedures and results. The advantages of the direct design scheme include overcoming the limit on the number of phase pixels and being capable of realizing beam shaping and splitting simultaneously. Numerical simulation shows that the uniformity of spots array pattern in the direct design is close to that of the indirect design. These results are helpful for the design and application of diffractive optical elements (DOEs) in modern optical devices.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleDesign of Diffractive Optical Elements by Direct and Indirect Construction of Diffraction Pattern: A Comparative Study
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume142
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Electronic Packaging
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4047190
dc.journal.fristpage041101-1
dc.journal.lastpage041101-4
dc.page4
dc.treeJournal of Electronic Packaging:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record