• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Special Section on Resilience of Engineering Systems

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    risk_006_02_020301.pdf (110.3Kb)
    Date
    2020
    Author
    Feng, Geng
    Beer, Michael
    Coolen, Frank P. A.
    Ayyub, Bilal M.
    Phoon, Kok-Kwang
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Our modern life has grown to depend on many and nearly ubiquitous large complex engineering systems, such as tunnels, gas/oil pipelines, geotechnical infrastructures, etc. All of these are the backbones of our modern society; therefore, complex real-world systems should not only be reliable, but also have high resilient capacity. Resilience is generally recognized as the ability of a critical infrastructure to recover from a disruptive event, and there is no doubt that we are experiencing a “resilience renaissance,” with attempts to embed system resilience almost everywhere for the well-being of our community. Therefore, analyzing and modeling the resilience of complex systems and networks have recently received significant interest from academia and industry. It has been recognized that such comprehensive development requires innovative theories, approaches, and technologies for resilient design and risk reduction for complex systems and networks. Such developments will facilitate further robust economic growth through resilient and efficient high-performance engineering systems. Additionally, developments should target resilient and cost-effective solutions to eliminate or reduce these vulnerabilities by making our complex systems and networks resilient at a minimum level of risk proneness. The goal is not to preserve existing systems, but to preserve and even enhance functions of critical high-technology systems, where failure consequences can be particularly severe. While qualitative assessment approaches are useful to understand how bad things are, quantitative assessment measures provide numerical estimation of system performance, time, and cost that are more meaningful to stakeholders.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4274473
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV