Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMyller, Katariina A. H.
dc.contributor.authorKorhonen, Rami K.
dc.contributor.authorTöyräs, Juha
dc.contributor.authorTanska, Petri
dc.contributor.authorVäänänen, Sami P.
dc.contributor.authorJurvelin, Jukka S.
dc.contributor.authorSaarakkala, Simo
dc.contributor.authorMononen, Mika E.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T14:45:33Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T14:45:33Z
dc.date.copyright2020/01/17/
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0148-0731
dc.identifier.otherbio_142_05_051001.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4274314
dc.description.abstractComputational models can provide information on joint function and risk of tissue failure related to progression of osteoarthritis (OA). Currently, the joint geometries utilized in modeling are primarily obtained via manual segmentation, which is time-consuming and hence impractical for direct clinical application. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of a previously developed semi-automatic method for segmenting tibial and femoral cartilage to serve as input geometry for finite element (FE) models. Knee joints from seven volunteers were first imaged using a clinical computed tomography (CT) with contrast enhancement and then segmented with semi-automatic and manual methods. In both segmentations, knee joint models with fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic (FRPVE) properties were generated and the mechanical responses of articular cartilage were computed during physiologically relevant loading. The mean differences in the absolute values of maximum principal stress, maximum principal strain, and fibril strain between the models generated from semi-automatic and manual segmentations were <1 MPa, <0.72% and <0.40%, respectively. Furthermore, contact areas, contact forces, average pore pressures, and average maximum principal strains were not statistically different between the models (p >0.05). This semi-automatic method speeded up the segmentation process by over 90% and there were only negligible differences in the results provided by the models utilizing either manual or semi-automatic segmentations. Thus, the presented CT imaging-based segmentation method represents a novel tool for application in FE modeling in the clinic when a physician needs to evaluate knee joint function.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleClinical Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography With Semi-Automatic Segmentation Provides Feasible Input for Computational Models of the Knee Joint
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume142
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4045279
dc.page51001
dc.treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record