Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHou, Tingbo
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yuanlong
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T14:44:27Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T14:44:27Z
dc.date.copyright2020/02/20/
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0022-1481
dc.identifier.otherht_142_04_042502.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4274274
dc.description.abstractThe rib arrangement has an important influence on the pressure drop and heat transfer performance of a microchannel heat exchanger (MHE) with circular reentrant cavities and ribs. In this study, four kinds of MHEs with circular reentrant cavity and ribs were designed, namely, circular reentrant cavities (circular), circular reentrant cavities and single-sided ribs (circular—single), circular reentrant cavities and odd-symmetric ribs (circular—odd), and circular reentrant cavities and double symmetric ribs (circular—double). The effect of the rib arrangement on the pressure drop and heat transfer performance of MHEs was numerically investigated by ansysfluent 15.0. The experimental platform was then designed and built for the subsequent experimental verification. The results showed that the pressure drop between the inlet and outlet of the MHE with circular reentrant cavities and ribs increased as the inlet flow increased. At the same inlet flowrate, the pressure drop between the inlet and outlet of the MHEs was largest for the circular reentrant cavities and double symmetric ribs, followed by the circular reentrant cavities and odd-symmetric ribs, circular reentrant cavities and single-sided ribs, and the circular reentrant cavities. The presence of the rib structure increased the inlet and outlet pressure drop of the MHE. The MHE with circular reentrant cavities and double symmetric ribs had the largest inlet and outlet pressure drop, followed by that with circular reentrant cavities and odd-symmetric ribs, that with circular reentrant cavities and single-sided ribs, and that with circular reentrant cavities, indicating that the latter exhibited the best pressure drop performance. At the same inlet flowrate, the MHE with circular reentrant cavities had the highest hot water outlet temperature and the MHE with circular reentrant cavities and double symmetric ribs had the lowest temperature, whereas the results were the opposite for the cold-water outlet temperature. This indicates that the heat transfer performance was best for the MHE with circular reentrant cavities and double symmetric ribs, followed by that with circular reentrant cavities and odd-symmetric ribs and that with circular reentrant cavities and single-sided ribs.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titlePressure Drop and Heat Transfer Performance of Microchannel Heat Exchanger With Circular Reentrant Cavities and Ribs
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume142
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Heat Transfer
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4045759
dc.page42502
dc.treeJournal of Heat Transfer:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record