Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLi, Xin
dc.contributor.authorDentinger, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorBrault, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorRoss, William R.
dc.contributor.authorOsterlitz, Mark
dc.contributor.authorFu, Lin
dc.contributor.authorWu, Mingye
dc.contributor.authorPrice, J. Scott
dc.contributor.authorDe Man, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorBueno, Clifford
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T14:33:40Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T14:33:40Z
dc.date.copyright2020/04/08/
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2572-3901
dc.identifier.othernde_3_3_031101.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4273913
dc.description.abstractWhen comparing the performance of different industrial X-ray computed tomography (CT) systems, reconstruction algorithms, or scan protocols, it is important to assess how well the required inspection and measurement tasks can be performed. Furthermore, it can be very informative to quantify image quality (IQ) metrics that can provide insight into the IQ characteristics that lead to the resulting inspection or measurement task performance. Inspection and measurement task performance is determined by basic characteristics such as spatial resolution; feature contrast, size, and shape; random noise (noise due to statistical uncertainty in measurements); and image artifacts. In this report, we describe a modular phantom set that enables robustly quantifying these characteristics and also enables assessing the performance of the inspection or measurement tasks themselves. The phantom set includes two phantom bodies and several insert types that can be optionally installed in the bodies. Phantom body extensions can be optionally included to increase scatter. The phantom bodies combined with the available insert types can comprehensively evaluate all important IQ metrics and inspection or measurement tasks. The precisely-known phantom body geometry and insert location, geometry, and orientation supports automatic analysis of large, complex experiments of multiple variables. This phantom set, with the associated image analysis software, could potentially serve as a general evaluation method for non-destructive testing (NDT) CT.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleToward Comprehensive Industrial Computed Tomography Image Quality Assessment: I. Phantom Design
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume3
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4046717
dc.page31101
dc.treeJournal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems:;2020:;volume( 003 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record