Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDaw, William
dc.contributor.authorKingshott, Ruth N.
dc.contributor.authorSaatchi, Reza
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Derek
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Robert
dc.contributor.authorHolloway, Alan
dc.contributor.authorTravis, Jon
dc.contributor.authorJones, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Ben
dc.contributor.authorElphick, Heather E.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T14:30:00Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T14:30:00Z
dc.date.copyright2020/05/14/
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1932-6181
dc.identifier.othermed_014_03_031002.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4273788
dc.description.abstractRespiratory rate (RR) is an important vital sign used in the initial and ongoing assessment of acutely ill patients. It is also used as a predictor of serious deterioration in a patient's clinical condition. Convenient electronic devices exist for measurement of pulse, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and temperature. Although devices which measure RR exist, none has entered everyday clinical practice. We have developed a contactless portable respiratory rate monitor (CPRM) and evaluated the agreement in respiratory rate measurements between existing methods and our new device. The CPRM uses thermal anemometry to measure breath signals during inspiration and expiration. RR data were collected from 52 healthy adult volunteers using respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) bands (established contact method), visual counting of chest movements (established noncontact method), and the CPRM (new method), simultaneously. Two differently shaped funnel attachments to the CPRM were evaluated for each volunteer. Data showed a good agreement between measurements from the CPRM and the gold standard RIP, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.836, mean difference 0.46 and 95% limits of agreement of −5.90 to 6.83. When separate air inlet funnels of the CPRM were analyzed, stronger agreement was seen with an elliptical air inlet; ICC 0.908, mean difference 0.37 with 95% limits of agreement −4.35 to 5.08. A contactless device for accurately and quickly measuring respiratory rate will be an important triage tool in the clinical assessment of patients. More testing is needed to explore the reasons for outlying measurements and to evaluate in the clinical setting.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleA Novel, Contactless, Portable “Spot-Check” Device Accurately Measures Respiratory Rate
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume14
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Medical Devices
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4046923
dc.page31002
dc.treeJournal of Medical Devices:;2020:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record