Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKimanzi, Raymos
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yuxing
dc.contributor.authorSalehi, Saeed
dc.contributor.authorMokhtari, Mehdi
dc.contributor.authorKhalifeh, Mahmoud
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T14:22:17Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T14:22:17Z
dc.date.copyright2020/04/08/
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0195-0738
dc.identifier.otherjert_142_9_092101.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4273523
dc.description.abstractCement is the prime barrier material to maintain zonal isolation during wellbore life-cycle. Different types of the cement have different performances on sealability. The primary objective of this study is evaluation of three types of cement systems, neat Class H, nano-synthetic graphite, and rock-based geopolymer cements, on interfacial bond integrity. Diametrical compressive tests are used on casing–cement–formation systems. Cement performances are tested in a conventional configuration (Berea Sandstone). A universal testing system is utilized to analyze the relationship applied load–axial strain and the digital image correlation (DIC) technique is used to generate the strain field maps. Based on the relationship and DIC results, bond strengths in different cement systems are evaluated. Additionally, microscope images provide insight explanations of the bond from micro-view. Based on the experimental results, failures of all cases initiate and propagate from the casing–cement interface. Then, radial cracks develop through the formation. This is because the mechanical interlocking bonds are formed only at the cement–sandstone interface to enhance the bond strength. The comparison of geopolymer and nano-modified cements with the conventional cement (neat Class H) shows that the unconventional cements have a lower maximum load and higher axial strain before failure of the samples. It indicates that both the two kinds of cements are more ductile than conventional cement and can support more deformation before the initiation of cracks.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleExperimental Evaluation of Geopolymer, Nano-Modified, and Neat Class H Cement by Using Diametrically Compressive Tests
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume142
dc.journal.issue9
dc.journal.titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4046702
dc.page92101
dc.treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 009
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record