Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTuan Anh Nguyen
dc.contributor.authorYuting Sun
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-01T22:00:03Z
dc.date.available2022-02-01T22:00:03Z
dc.date.issued11/1/2021
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000495.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272441
dc.description.abstractThe literature on public-private partnership (PPP) agreements suggests that variation renegotiation places the public sector authority at a disadvantage, because the authority has to pay extra costs to claim its variation. This leads to the need for a PPP contract to incorporate flexibility, embedded with real options analysis (ROA), to deal with these variations. This paper proposes that PPP agreements should ideally contain an option for the authority to order variation as an effective response to changing circumstances in the postconstruction phase throughout the concession period of toll roads. Having the variation option, the authority sets a threshold on the concessionaire’s bargaining power via variation negotiation as the authority can order its variation at its favorably controlled price. The paper also presents the ROA, based on the probabilistic cash flow approach, that gives the financial value of flexibility for the authority to order variation. This approach is straightforward and provides a fair way forward for the implementation of PPP toll roads.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleVariation Negotiation in PPP Toll-Road Projects: Option Approach
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume13
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000495
dc.journal.fristpage04521025-1
dc.journal.lastpage04521025-10
dc.page10
dc.treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2021:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record