Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMariam Elazhary
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-01T21:59:32Z
dc.date.available2022-02-01T21:59:32Z
dc.date.issued8/1/2021
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000485.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272431
dc.description.abstractDelays are a matter of fact in the majority of construction projects; accordingly, the field of forensic planning resulted in numerous delay methods being utilized. Implementing these methods has given rise to the major dispute of attributing an undocumented delay in the project schedule to a certain party. Despite previous research efforts, no established delay analysis technique sets a methodology while taking into account that some delays may exist that have not been identified or attributed. This paper aims to establish a step-by-step protocol for a delay analysis that would focus on merging two established techniques to fill the aforementioned gap while combining their recognized advantages. This paper demonstrates that adding one to the other would enhance the latter by properly identifying/attributing undocumented delays. Such takes place through a tracking process that utilizes the float path interface in Primavera P6 for an automated process. Through a case study demonstration, the proposed method shows promising results as opposed to applying the techniques individually.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleTracking Delay Analysis
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume13
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000485
dc.journal.fristpage04521020-1
dc.journal.lastpage04521020-10
dc.page10
dc.treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2021:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record