Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDerrick J. Satterfield
dc.contributor.authorJack C. Griffin
dc.contributor.authorTerin George
dc.contributor.authorSage R. Hiibel
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-01T21:48:16Z
dc.date.available2022-02-01T21:48:16Z
dc.date.issued8/1/2021
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29EE.1943-7870.0001894.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272061
dc.description.abstractFouling remains a critical barrier for the continued development of forward-osmosis (FO) membrane bioreactor technology (MBR). Thermal osmotic backwashing at 23°C, 60°C, and 80°C, coupled air scouring, and the impact of frequency and duration of ambient (23°C) osmotic backwashing were evaluated as nonchemical methods for mitigation and removal of biological fouling in an FO-MBR. Results demonstrate that backwashing at elevated temperatures increases the immediate water flux recovery by 7% but does not provide mid- or long-term productivity improvements when compared to ambient temperature backwashing. Constant air scouring was the most effective for minimizing fouling in a bench-scale FO-MBR process; however, a full-scale energy analysis revealed that the high capital and operating costs of constant scouring outweigh the water productivity gains observed. Optimization of ambient backwashing duration and frequency was the most economically efficient FO-MBR fouling mitigation approach.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleBiological Fouling Mitigation in a Forward-Osmosis Membrane Bioreactor
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume147
dc.journal.issue8
dc.journal.titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001894
dc.journal.fristpage04021025-1
dc.journal.lastpage04021025-7
dc.page7
dc.treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 008
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record