• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Evaluating Soil Water Redistribution under Mobile Drip Irrigation, Low-Elevation Spray Application, and Low-Energy Precision Application Using HYDRUS

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001553.pdf (1.240Mb)
    Date
    6/1/2021
    Author
    Tobias E. Oker
    Aleksey Y. Sheshukov
    Jonathan Aguilar
    Danny H. Rogers
    Isaya Kisekka
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    A study to assess soil water redistribution under mobile drip irrigation (MDI), low-energy precision application (LEPA), and low-elevation spray application (LESA) was conducted under a center-pivot irrigation system. Water application devices included MDI (MDI1 and MDI2 flow rates of 3.7 and 7.6  L/h, respectively), LEPA bubbler, and LESA spray. Measured soil water content was used to calibrate HYDRUS (2D/3D) version 2.05.0270, which was then used to simulate water redistribution within the soil profile after irrigation by MDI, LESA, and LEPA. Results showed that for all the devices, the effect of irrigation was mostly limited to the top 60 cm of the soil profile 72 h after irrigation. MDI driplines and LEPA showed the highest lateral soil water redistribution. The mean soil water contents for MDI1, MDI2, LEPA, and LESA at a depth of 30 cm were 0.31, 0.31, 0.31, and 0.33  cm·cm−3 respectively; at a depth of 60 cm the corresponding values were 0.28, 0.28, 0.26, and 0.28  cm·cm−3, respectively. The interquartile range of soil water content at 30 cm for MDI1 and MDI2 was 0.04  cm·cm−3; the value for LEPA was 0.02  cm·cm−3. The results indicated greater nonuniformity under MDI than under LESA. The results also showed that the MDI water redistribution pattern was similar to that of LEPA, but horizontal uniformity was less than with LESA. MDI had 48% and 19% less runoff potential compared with LEPA and LESA, respectively. Although soil water redistribution uniformity under MDI was less than under LESA and LEPA, it enabled better infiltration and lessened runoff potential.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271726
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV