• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Development of Synthetic Rating Curves: Case Study in Iowa

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0002022.pdf (2.787Mb)
    Date
    1/1/2021
    Author
    Felipe Quintero
    Marcela Rojas
    Marian Muste
    Witold F. Krajewski
    Gabriel Perez
    Shirley Johnson
    Amanda Anderson
    Toby Hunemuller
    Bill Cappuccio
    Jeffrey Zogg
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This case study describes an economically feasible approach to generate synthetic rating curves that enhance utility of stage-only river gauges. The study is based on a network of 250 bridge-mounted river-stage sensors (BMRSS) that the Iowa Flood Center has deployed in Iowa. The authors investigated using the step-backwater model with the Hydrologic Engineer Center’s River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) to develop a stage-discharge relationship. The authors installed BMRSS at eight sites collocated with USGS gauging stations with well-established stage-discharge ratings to serve as reference. They also surveyed the channel cross sections in the upstream and downstream vicinity of the sensor locations. To account for uncertainty of channel roughness and free surface slope, they ran the model using a Monte Carlo simulation. The resulting rating curve realizations were compared with the USGS reference. The study reports the distribution of relative errors in the synthetic curve estimates, conditioned on the value of discharge. The results show average discharge errors of less than 5% for flows within the main channel banks and less than 3% in the floodplain. The average stage error is 0.43 m (range of 0.2–0.9 m). The authors also explored the error induced by using airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR)-based topographic surveys for the cross-sectional geometry. They assessed the model-based methodology at an additional 19 locations where USGS maintains rating curves and concluded that the results were inferior compared with those obtained using conventional geodetic surveys. The study provides a basis for expanded monitoring of streams and rivers with stage-only sensors.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271560
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV