Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRebecca Komarek
dc.contributor.authorAngela R. Bielefeldt
dc.contributor.authorDaniel W. Knight
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-01T00:15:58Z
dc.date.available2022-02-01T00:15:58Z
dc.date.issued10/1/2021
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29EI.2643-9115.0000049.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271173
dc.description.abstractThis study examined self, peer, and instructor ratings of leadership behaviors in four areas: collaboration, creativity, organization/control, and competition for 98 students in one civil engineering capstone design course. There was no significant difference between ratings of students based on gender identification within or across all three rater groups. However, peer ratings for all four leadership behaviors for underrepresented race/ethnicity minorities (URM) were lower than for non-URM students. Instructor ratings were lower for international students than for domestic students. Even with low sample sizes, these results warrant further research on implicit bias in leadership ratings within engineering education, with a special focus on the bias against URM and international students.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleMultirater Feedback of Leadership of Underrepresented Groups in a Civil Engineering Capstone Design Course
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume147
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Civil Engineering Education
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000049
dc.journal.fristpage04021008-1
dc.journal.lastpage04021008-10
dc.page10
dc.treeJournal of Civil Engineering Education:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record