• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Civil Engineering Education
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Civil Engineering Education
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Gamifying Sustainable Engineering Courses: Student and Instructor Perspectives of Community, Engagement, Learning, and Retention

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29EI.2643-9115.0000047.pdf (453.3Kb)
    Date
    10/1/2021
    Author
    Renee Clark
    Abra Spisso
    Kevin J. Ketchman
    Amy E. Landis
    Kristen Parrish
    Rezvan Mohammadiziazi
    Melissa M. Bilec
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Recruitment, retention, and preparation of students in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields are critical to meeting the global challenges of the 21st century. Gamification—game playing concepts used in another activity—has been postulated as an active teaching strategy that engages students, encourages a sense of community, and develops students’ professional skills, which are all core components to recruitment, retention, and preparation. To explore the impact of game design and play on students’ higher levels of perceived cognitive/learning engineering-related and course-specific concepts, higher levels of student engagement, a sense of community, professional skills, retention, and easy transferability for university-level educators, board game design and play projects were implemented in three civil, environmental, and construction engineering courses at the University of Pittsburgh, Arizona State University, and Clemson University in 2016. Findings obtained from analyzing students’ responses to an open-ended survey and focus group questions indicated that game design and play were effective in learning technical course content, including content related to sustainability and construction terminology, but these results were related to lower levels of Bloom’s taxonomy. Both the classroom observations and the focus group/interviews revealed that game design and game play enhanced engagement. The Likert survey results did not show a statistically significant difference in the sense of community but did show a statistically significant positive difference in the professional skill of writing. Lastly, neither the Likert survey results nor the focus group/interview results showed that game design and play impacted retention. Given these results, the findings of this study are cautiously optimistic at best for the applications of game design and play in engineering curricula as a method for recruiting, retaining, and preparing students. Recommendations for improving game design studies as well as the implementation of game design projects in engineering courses are provided.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271171
    Collections
    • Journal of Civil Engineering Education

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV