Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSvetlana Pushkar
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-01T00:04:32Z
dc.date.available2022-02-01T00:04:32Z
dc.date.issued6/1/2021
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29AE.1943-5568.0000467.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270871
dc.description.abstractThis study assessed the effects of project size on the achievement of Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Operations and Maintenance: Existing Buildings version 4 (LEED-EB V4) categories and credits in platinum, gold, silver, and certified projects in the United States. Cliff's δ or log odds ratio effect sizes and exact Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney or Fisher's exact 2 × 2 tests were used to estimate the difference between medium (2,323–13,935 m2) and large (>13,935 m2) LEED-EB V4 project sizes. The results showed that medium projects performed best in the sustainable structures and energy and atmosphere categories, whereas large projects performed best in the location and transportation and water efficiency categories. Medium-to-large projects achieved similar results in the materials and resources and indoor environment quality categories. The identified relationship between project size and category performance can help building practitioners guide the selection of LEED strategies for similar project sizes.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleImpact of Project Size on LEED-EB V4 Credit Achievement in the United States
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume27
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000467
dc.journal.fristpage04021012-1
dc.journal.lastpage04021012-8
dc.page8
dc.treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record