Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVahid Abbasi Moghaddam
dc.contributor.authorMassoud Tabesh
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-31T23:56:43Z
dc.date.available2022-01-31T23:56:43Z
dc.date.issued7/1/2021
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0001390.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270620
dc.description.abstractMost sampling design (SD) methods in water distribution networks are focused on the calibration of a hydraulic model and use local sensitivity analysis and demand-driven simulation methods to select sampling points. These SD methods have little adaptability for water quality models separately or with hydraulic models. In this paper, which presents a new approach, the Sobol method is used for sensitivity analysis. Then optimal points are selected based on sensitivity and cost criteria. It is possible to apply this method in a joint SD of hydraulic and quality models. This method is applied and verified in a case study. The effect of the head-driven simulation method (HDSM) and different parameters on SD are also evaluated. The results indicate that the Sobol method and HDSM cause a significant shift in the priority of some selected points. In addition, the proposed method for the joint SD of hydraulic and quality models has a suitable capability.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleSampling Design of Hydraulic and Quality Model Calibration Based on a Global Sensitivity Analysis Method
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume147
dc.journal.issue7
dc.journal.titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001390
dc.journal.fristpage04021035-1
dc.journal.lastpage04021035-8
dc.page8
dc.treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 007
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record