• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Urban Planning and Development
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Urban Planning and Development
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Framework for Comparative Evaluation of Car-Sharing Alternatives for Urban and Suburban Regions: Case Study of Mumbai, India

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29UP.1943-5444.0000705.pdf (1.161Mb)
    Date
    9/1/2021
    Author
    Deepjyoti Das
    Pradip P. Kalbar
    Nagendra R. Velaga
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Indian cities are facing increases in their population, a crisis with space, and urbanization, which is leading to severe transport sector emissions, congestion, and unsustainable growth in car ownership. One solution is to adopt car-sharing, which is a good example of a circular economy (CE) and promotes sustainable mobility development. There are many car-sharing models; however, minimal knowledge is available regarding their suitability for Indian cities. This study will attempt to bridge the knowledge gap by developing a framework to compare car-sharing models. Further, an appropriate car-sharing model will be identified for Mumbai, India. This framework will be based on a scenario-based comparative analysis and will employ experts’ judgment that is based on a multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. The aggregated results from the experts’ input indicate that a carpool would be the preferred car-sharing model for urban and suburban scenarios. Accessibility and transport cost are the most critical indicators for urban and suburban regions, respectively. A detailed discussion on each criterion and indicator will be provided to develop suitable recommendations for future policymaking and asset utilization. A rigorous sensitivity analysis that used 25 different weight-based scenarios will be conducted to assess the robustness and internally validate the results. The sensitivity analysis suggested that focusing on individual indicators was not enough to influence the overall results; however, technical and environmental and health criteria were identified as the most sensitive in this study.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270539
    Collections
    • Journal of Urban Planning and Development

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV