Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSalem Buhashima Abdalla
dc.contributor.authorMamun Rashid
dc.contributor.authorDilshad Rahat Ara
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-31T23:33:45Z
dc.date.available2022-01-31T23:33:45Z
dc.date.issued6/1/2021
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29AE.1943-5568.0000457.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269946
dc.description.abstractAlthough the reasons for and against the early use of digital tools in design have been intensively researched and studied for years, there has been a scarcity of substantial analysis of the challenges posed by using computer-assisted architectural design (CAAD) tools in the early design phase. By drawing on reviewed materials and cross-mapping digital software and current commercially available programs, this paper elucidates and evaluated the impact of CAAD tools in the early design process. In this research, a two-way, systematic mapping of research-based tools that support the conceptual design process and commercial CAAD methods was implemented, utilizing five criteria as illustrated in a recent study. The paper concludes with three scenarios of CAAD’s future direction, which will have an impact on conventional architectural engineering, as well as architectural practice and education.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titlePlausibility of CAAD in Conceptual Design: Challenges in Architectural Engineering for Early-Stage Digital Design Tools
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume27
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000457
dc.journal.fristpage04021004-1
dc.journal.lastpage04021004-13
dc.page13
dc.treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record