| dc.contributor.author | Salem Buhashima Abdalla | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mamun Rashid | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dilshad Rahat Ara | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-31T23:33:45Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-31T23:33:45Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 6/1/2021 | |
| dc.identifier.other | %28ASCE%29AE.1943-5568.0000457.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269946 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Although the reasons for and against the early use of digital tools in design have been intensively researched and studied for years, there has been a scarcity of substantial analysis of the challenges posed by using computer-assisted architectural design (CAAD) tools in the early design phase. By drawing on reviewed materials and cross-mapping digital software and current commercially available programs, this paper elucidates and evaluated the impact of CAAD tools in the early design process. In this research, a two-way, systematic mapping of research-based tools that support the conceptual design process and commercial CAAD methods was implemented, utilizing five criteria as illustrated in a recent study. The paper concludes with three scenarios of CAAD’s future direction, which will have an impact on conventional architectural engineering, as well as architectural practice and education. | |
| dc.publisher | ASCE | |
| dc.title | Plausibility of CAAD in Conceptual Design: Challenges in Architectural Engineering for Early-Stage Digital Design Tools | |
| dc.type | Journal Paper | |
| dc.journal.volume | 27 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 2 | |
| dc.journal.title | Journal of Architectural Engineering | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000457 | |
| dc.journal.fristpage | 04021004-1 | |
| dc.journal.lastpage | 04021004-13 | |
| dc.page | 13 | |
| dc.tree | Journal of Architectural Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 002 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext | |