Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMitchell Scovell
dc.contributor.authorConnar McShane
dc.contributor.authorAnne Swinbourne
dc.contributor.authorDaniel Smith
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T22:43:18Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T22:43:18Z
dc.date.issued2/1/2021
dc.identifier.other(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000417.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269476
dc.description.abstractStructural upgrades can mitigate property damage caused by tropical cyclones. However, people in high-risk areas do not always install these upgrades. This paper used the protective action decision model (PADM) as a theoretical framework for explaining one specific type of structural mitigation behavior: the installation of cyclone shutters. The results indicated that the degree to which people think and talk about cyclones (hazard intrusiveness) was a significant predictor of behavior but that risk perception was not. Moreover, the results show that people need to perceive that installing shutters has benefits beyond mitigating damage (e.g., increases property value and has utility for other purposes). Contrary to past research, it was also found that the perceived cost of shutter installation (in terms of time, money, and effort) was important. The results provide evidence for the utility of the PADM for explaining long-term, high-cost natural hazard mitigation behavior.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleApplying the Protective Action Decision Model to Explain Cyclone Shutter Installation Behavior
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume22
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000417
dc.journal.fristpage04020043
dc.journal.lastpage04020043-8
dc.page8
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2021:;Volume ( 022 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record