Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlfonso Cerna-Diaz
dc.contributor.authorScott M. Olson
dc.contributor.authorYoussef M. A. Hashash
dc.contributor.authorOzgun A. Numanoglu
dc.contributor.authorCassandra J. Rutherford
dc.contributor.authorLopamudra Bhaumik
dc.contributor.authorThomas Weaver
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T21:51:23Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T21:51:23Z
dc.date.issued10/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0002352.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4268956
dc.description.abstractDynamic centrifuge tests were performed to investigate multidirectional loading effects on the shear and volumetric response of saturated sands under partially drained, level-ground conditions. These tests illustrate that dense sand shear response is not affected significantly by multidirectional shaking and can be estimated reasonably by one-dimensional nonlinear total and effective stress site response analyses. Multidirectionality factors for both excess porewater pressure (MDFru) and vertical strain (MDFεv) tended to increase with density and decrease with shaking intensity. Specifically, MDFru ranged from about 1 to 4, with an average value of about 2 for low ru values and MDFru approaching unity as the soil approaches liquefaction. Similarly, MDFεv ranged from about 1 to 3, with an average value of about 2 for low ru values and MDFεv approaching 1.3 as the soil approached liquefaction. Multidirectionality factors as functions of the factor of safety against liquefaction are proposed that differ from constant MDFs recommended elsewhere. Lastly, energy-based intensity measures provided nearly unique estimates of excess porewater pressure and vertical strain for both uni- and bidirectional motions, avoiding the need for MDFs.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleResponse of Sands to Multidirectional Dynamic Loading in Centrifuge Tests
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume146
dc.journal.issue10
dc.journal.titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002352
dc.page16
dc.treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 010
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record