Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaría Rosende
dc.contributor.authorManuel Miró
dc.contributor.authorAntonio Salinas
dc.contributor.authorAntoni Palerm
dc.contributor.authorElena Laso
dc.contributor.authorJuan Frau
dc.contributor.authorJoan Puig
dc.contributor.authorJoan Miquel Matas
dc.contributor.authorAntonio Doménech-Sánchez
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T21:33:28Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T21:33:28Z
dc.date.issued1/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29EE.1943-7870.0001610.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4268421
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to ascertain the biocidal efficacy, based on the so-called C·t values, and the usage expenses of seven disinfection products in recreational waters using Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as microorganism models of fecal and environmental contamination, respectively. A 250-L indoor fully equipped pool basin was harnessed as a proof-of-concept setup for the evaluation of chlorine-based [viz., trichloroisocyanuric acid (trichloro), sodium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite + isocyanuric acid, and saline electrolysis] and unconventional (viz., 1-bromo-3-chloro-5,5-dimethylilhidantoine, chlorine dioxide and hydrogen peroxide) biocides at 30°C and different pH values. The economic losses resulting from human action, mimicked by urea addition, were also considered. Experimental results showed that trichloro, chlorine dioxide, and sodium hypochlorite were the most effective disinfection agents with a log 3 removal of both organisms in 60 s regardless of the water pH. On the other hand, sodium hypochlorite and trichloro afforded unparalleled cost-effectiveness. Chlorine dioxide exhibits the greatest biocide efficacy, yet its elevated usage costs make it merely applicable in shock treatments to offset high organic loads.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleCost-Effectiveness Analysis of Chlorine-Based and Alternative Disinfection Systems for Pool Waters
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume146
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001610
dc.page10
dc.treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record