• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Surface Reservoir Reoperation for Managed Aquifer Recharge: Folsom Reservoir System

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0001305.pdf (1.507Mb)
    Date
    12/1/2020
    Author
    Erfan Goharian
    Mohamad Azizipour
    Samuel Sandoval-Soils
    Graham E. Fogg
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    As is much of the world, California increasingly is challenged by water scarcity. A recent multiyear drought depleted surface reservoir and groundwater storage in many places of the state. The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), passed in 2014, promises sustainable groundwater management in California and suggests managed aquifer recharge (MAR) as one of the key practices to eliminate groundwater overdraft by groundwater sustainability agencies. Questions remain, however, about the amount of water available for MAR. Conjunctive management provides the opportunity to modify reservoir operations and enhance recharge long before any drought occurs. However, the amount by which reoperation of surface reservoirs can increase the available water for MAR has not been thoroughly investigated. Folsom reservoir is operated to meet a variety of objectives, including flood control, water supply, hydropower, and environmental flow. The inclusion of water discharge for groundwater recharge adds another objective for the operation of the reservoir and complicates the decision-making. Various management strategies were developed and applied to evaluate performance of the system during a historical period, and a new objective was added to maximize the available water for recharge from Folsom reservoir. Although the reoperation strategy offers additional storage in the system and increases the expected value of recharge from 280 to 430 million cubic meter (mcm) per year, trade-offs between different objectives showed that new operating rules perform quite satisfactorily, with nonsignificant deficits and violations of old objectives.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267939
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV