Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDiego Paez
dc.contributor.authorYves Filion
dc.contributor.authorMario Castro-Gama
dc.contributor.authorClaudia Quintiliani
dc.contributor.authorSimone Santopietro
dc.contributor.authorChris Sweetapple
dc.contributor.authorFanlin Meng
dc.contributor.authorRaziyeh Farmani
dc.contributor.authorGuangtao Fu
dc.contributor.authorDavid Butler
dc.contributor.authorQingzhou Zhang
dc.contributor.authorFeifei Zheng
dc.contributor.authorKegong Diao
dc.contributor.authorBogumil Ulanicki
dc.contributor.authorYuan Huang
dc.contributor.authorJochen Deuerlein
dc.contributor.authorDeni
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T21:15:01Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T21:15:01Z
dc.date.issued8/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0001239.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267878
dc.description.abstractThe paper presents the results of the Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration (BPDRR) presented in a special session at the first International water distribution systems analysis & computing and control in the water industry (WDSA/CCWI) Joint Conference, held in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, in July 2018. The BPDRR problem focused on how to respond and restore water service after the occurrence of five earthquake scenarios that cause structural damage in a water distribution system. Participants were required to propose a prioritization schedule to fix the damages of each scenario while following restrictions on visibility/nonvisibility of damages. Each team/approach was evaluated against six performance criteria: (1) time without supply for hospital/firefighting, (2) rapidity of recovery, (3) resilience loss, (4) average time of no user service, (5) number of users without service for eight consecutive hours, and (6) water loss. Three main types of approaches were identified from the submissions: (1) general-purpose metaheuristic algorithms, (2) greedy algorithms, and (3) ranking-based prioritizations. All three approaches showed potential to solve the challenge efficiently. The results of the participants showed that for this network, the impact of a large-diameter pipe failure on the network is more significant than several smaller pipes failures. The location of isolation valves and the size of hydraulic segments influenced the resilience of the system during emergencies. On average, the interruptions to water supply (hospitals and firefighting) varied considerably among solutions and emergency scenarios, highlighting the importance of private water storage for emergencies. The effects of damages and repair work were more noticeable during the peak demand periods (morning and noontime) than during the low-flow periods; and tank storage helped to preserve functionality of the network in the first few hours after a simulated event.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleBattle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume146
dc.journal.issue8
dc.journal.titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001239
dc.page13
dc.treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 008
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record