Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiguel Lopes
dc.contributor.authorSara Santos Cruz
dc.contributor.authorPaulo Pinho
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T21:12:16Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T21:12:16Z
dc.date.issued12/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29UP.1943-5444.0000608.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267813
dc.description.abstractPublic spaces, one of the key elements of the urban structure, have always accompanied major urban changes, with different levels of success. Recently, new forms of space provision and management have emerged, disrupting spatial structures; redefining social values, needs, and routines; and changing the way traditional public spaces are perceived. Although the last decades brought an extensive study and debate regarding the particularities of public spaces, different disciplines and points of view are rarely combined, justifying the need for a new tool. This paper describes the application of the publicness evaluation model (PEM) to eight case studies in Oporto, Portugal, and Newcastle upon Tyne, England. With the use of four interconnected areas of analysis, this framework attempts to include the particularities of the involvement of different stakeholders in the production of contemporary public space, as well as their concerns and expectations regarding each space, through the creation of a composite publicness score.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titlePublicness of Contemporary Urban Spaces: Comparative Study Between Porto and Newcastle
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume146
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000608
dc.page13
dc.treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record