Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThomas Cadenazzi
dc.contributor.authorSteven Nolan
dc.contributor.authorGianbattista Mazzocchi
dc.contributor.authorZachary Stringer
dc.contributor.authorAntonio Nanni
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T21:03:42Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T21:03:42Z
dc.date.issued4/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29CC.1943-5614.0000998.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267584
dc.description.abstractCivil works construction is now facing a transformational change with the growing implementation of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) materials as rebars and tendons for concrete structures. To avoid surprises and decrease risk, a contractor must be cognizant of FRP’s differences with traditional steel reinforcement in terms of procurement, quality control, and installation. A bridge replacement project under construction in Florida is presented in this paper as a case study to address the technology’s constructability and adaptability in a number of structural elements for both substructure and superstructure. The paper also provides some productivity considerations for the case of FRP reinforcing cage assembly in terms of work hours, including a comparison with the traditional steel solution. The case study points out critical issues such as procurement, acceptance, and workforce experience that can provide guidance for both implementation and standardization of the technology.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleBridge Case Study: What a Contractor Needs to Know on an FRP Reinforcement Project
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume24
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Composites for Construction
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000998
dc.page12
dc.treeJournal of Composites for Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record