Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrabhata K. Swamee
dc.contributor.authorAshok K. Sharma
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T21:00:00Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T21:00:00Z
dc.date.issued2/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29PS.1949-1204.0000436.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267479
dc.description.abstractA water supply gravity main does not require power input; thus, it is preferred in comparison to a water supply pumping main. Moreover, a gravity main has greater reliability because it does not have moving parts, e.g., pumps and motors, and is independent of power requirement. Availability of a regular power supply at a required current and voltage is a problem in many parts of the globe. For a gently sloping topography, the gravity main involves large pipe diameters. Thus, in comparison with a pumping main, a gravity main may be uneconomical due to large size and associated overall cost. A review of the literature indicated that there is no guideline available for the adoption of a gravity main for a gently sloping terrain. In this investigation, a criterion has been obtained to ascertain if a gravity main or pumping main will be economic for a given gentle terrain for pipe laying.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleEconomic Viability of Water-Supply Gravity Main
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume11
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000436
dc.page3
dc.treeJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice:;2020:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record