Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYu Bai
dc.contributor.authorYuhong Zeng
dc.contributor.authorQian Li
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T20:43:24Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T20:43:24Z
dc.date.issued11/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001511.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267005
dc.description.abstractDrainage ditches are effective agricultural facilities because they can drain excess water from the field, and an eco-friendly drainage ditch can also eliminate agricultural nonpoint source pollution effectively. Field work has been conducted in four types of drainage ditches with different revetment techniques, i.e., a two-stage ditch with a woodpile bank, a single trapezoidal ditch with a geotextile bag, a hollow hexagonal brick, and a reinforced vegetative bank revetment. The corresponding retention capacity of phosphorus in these ditches has been investigated. Results show that two-stage ditches can retain dissolved phosphorus (DP) more effectively compared to the other three single trapezoidal drainage ditches, and the retention efficiency is as high as 60%. The concentration of total suspended sediment (TSS) is positively correlated with that of total phosphorus (TP), and the retention capacity of drainage ditches on phosphorus will decrease as discharge increases. Current work proves that a well-designed two-stage section ditch can effectively eliminate the nonpoint source pollution during practical agriculture drainage application.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleRetaining Performance of Four Types of Drainage Ditch on Phosphorus: Field Work
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume146
dc.journal.issue11
dc.journal.titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001511
dc.page8
dc.treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 011
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record