Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarcos Valle Bueno
dc.contributor.authorAlexssandra Dayane Soares de Campos
dc.contributor.authorJaqueline Trombetta da Silva
dc.contributor.authorJoseph Massey
dc.contributor.authorLuis Carlos Timm
dc.contributor.authorLessandro Coll Faria
dc.contributor.authorÁlvaro Roel
dc.contributor.authorJosé Maria Barbat Parfitt
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T20:42:28Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T20:42:28Z
dc.date.issued8/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001483.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266978
dc.description.abstractLand leveling is used to correct soil surface irregularities to improve surface drainage and irrigation. It also makes the area more manageable for an array of agricultural activities such as planting and harvesting. The objective of this work was to evaluate two designs of land forming, one aimed at optimizing drainage and the other at optimizing surface irrigation, using fields with reliefs typical of the lowlands of southern Brazil. Seven commercial rice fields, ranging in size from 7 to 26 ha, were randomly selected and digital elevation designs generated for each. Land-leveling projects were developed using three designs: uniform slope (US) (control), land forming–drainage (LFD), and land forming–irrigation (LFI). Performance comparisons between the designs were evaluated through impacts on soil movement (SM), maximum cut in 99% of the area (MC), cumulative length of levees (LL), and total number of levees (NL). Results indicate that both LFD and LFI designs would reduce costs and require less soil disturbance compared to leveling to uniform slopes. LFD would require less soil movement and lower maximum cuts than LFI. However, LFI would reduce the lengths and numbers of rice levees that could have long-term economic and agronomic benefits not captured in these analyses. These results demonstrate that all land-leveling and land-forming alternatives should be thoroughly examined before undertaking field operations. Study outcomes will be useful to engineers and producers in evaluating options to improve the agricultural productivity of lowlands in southern Brazil, a region of national and international significance.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleImproving the Drainage and Irrigation Efficiency of Lowland Soils: Land-Forming Options for Southern Brazil
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume146
dc.journal.issue8
dc.journal.titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001483
dc.page8
dc.treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 008
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record