Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorM. J. Uddin
dc.contributor.authorS. R. Murphy
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T20:42:18Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T20:42:18Z
dc.date.issued8/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001469.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266972
dc.description.abstractA comprehensive review of evaporation losses and evapotranspiration (ET) dynamics in sprinkler irrigation revealed substantial differences in the magnitudes of the different components of evaporation. Field studies reported that droplet evaporation losses ranged from 0.5%–45%, whereas theoretical studies indicated losses of less than 1%. A recent experimental study using advanced instruments and methodologies estimated that canopy evaporation is the major evaporation loss and droplet evaporation could be assumed to be negligible. Other studies showed that evaporation increased and transpiration decreased in evapotranspiration dynamics during wet canopy conditions. Sensible and latent heat fluxes in sprinkler irrigated crops act in opposite ways, but both positively contribute to the available energy and total ET.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleEvaporation Losses and Evapotranspiration Dynamics in Overhead Sprinkler Irrigation
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume146
dc.journal.issue8
dc.journal.titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001469
dc.page9
dc.treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 008
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record