Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMabrouk Abaza
dc.contributor.authorVincent Fortin
dc.contributor.authorÉtienne Gaborit
dc.contributor.authorStéphane Bélair
dc.contributor.authorCamille Garnaud
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T20:36:44Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T20:36:44Z
dc.date.issued10/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001983.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266814
dc.description.abstractThis paper explored various configurations of the ensemble Kalman filter, the GR4J hydrological model, and the Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) atmospheric model in order to maximize the skill of ensemble hydrological forecasts for the Lake Champlain–Richelieu River watershed. In open-loop mode, the hydrological model represented very well the observed streamflow (Nash–Sutcliffe value above 90%). It sufficed to assimilate hydrological data to obtain a reliable and skillful analysis of streamflow; assimilation of snow water equivalent (SWE) information did not bring additional benefits. In forecast mode, the opposite was true: hydrological assimilation alone did not improve forecast performance, but assimilating SWE data improved reliability and skill of forecasts with lead times of 15 days to 1 month. The impact of SWE assimilation also depended on the quality of the precipitation analysis. It therefore is recommended to use SWE assimilation for monthly forecasting, especially if the precipitation data used to drive the hydrological model are biased.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleAssessing 32-Day Hydrological Ensemble Forecasts in the Lake Champlain–Richelieu River Watershed
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume25
dc.journal.issue10
dc.journal.titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001983
dc.page13
dc.treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 010
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record