Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKevin M. Simmons
dc.contributor.authorPaul Kovacs
dc.contributor.authorAdam B. Smith
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T20:01:53Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T20:01:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29NH.1527-6996.0000358.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266400
dc.description.abstractIn 2002, Florida enacted the first statewide building code based on wind engineering principles. After a tragic tornado in 2013, which killed 24, including seven school children, Moore, Oklahoma, followed suit. We use results from evaluating the cost-effectiveness of both Florida and Moore’s code to determine if other states would benefit from a building code based on similar standards. Of the 20 states examined, eight have positive benefit to cost ratios, with three showing paybacks of less than 20 years. This result suggests that statewide building codes designed for the protection of wind hazards should be considered beyond Florida.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleState-by-State Analysis of Benefits to Cost from Wind-Enhanced Building Codes
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume21
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000358
dc.page04020007
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2020:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record