Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMelanie Gall
dc.contributor.authorCarol J. Friedland
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T20:01:32Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T20:01:32Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29NH.1527-6996.0000342.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266387
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides an accounting of where and when mitigation and recovery investments have occurred in Louisiana, thereby generating a mitigation investment portfolio for the state. An exploratory data analysis of FEMA OpenData sets, supplemented by data on disaster damage and recovery, was conducted to develop a portfolio of mitigation actions implemented in the State of Louisiana since 1989 and to calculate damage to mitigation and recovery to mitigation expenditure ratios. Not surprisingly, Louisiana relies heavily on funding from the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, which it largely spends on home elevations and acquisitions with limited utilization of other mitigation actions. Our analysis of Louisiana expenditures shows that, on average, residents suffer nearly $260 in direct disaster losses for every $1 invested in mitigation and the federal government spends $10 on recovery for every $1 invested in mitigation. At these levels, mitigation investments are ineffective and/or insufficient in stabilizing the state’s damage trajectory.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleIf Mitigation Saves $6 Per Every $1 Spent, Then Why Are We Not Investing More? A Louisiana Perspective on a National Issue
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume21
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleNatural Hazards Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000342
dc.page04019013
dc.treeNatural Hazards Review:;2020:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record