Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAdrian McCallum
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-30T19:25:34Z
dc.date.available2022-01-30T19:25:34Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29CR.1943-5495.0000206.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265278
dc.description.abstractBoth cone penetration test (CPT) tip resistance data and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) amplitude data vary at the interface of snow layers of different density. Therefore, relationships between these data should be observable, enabling spatial extrapolation of CPT tip resistance values using GPR. Quantitative analysis of GPR amplitude data occurs in pavement analysis, but these techniques have not been applied to snow. GPR sounding using a commercially available ground-coupled 400 MHz antenna was conducted in the immediate vicinity of numerous CPT holes in Antarctic firn. Comparison between CPT tip resistance and GPR amplitude data reveals that extrapolation of point CPT resistance data is possible over large spatial areas by tracking GPR horizons that equate with CPT resistance value. In addition, GPR amplitude and polarity can reveal information about relative snowpack density. GPR can be used efficaciously with CPT snow resistance data, enabling efficient extrapolation of snow physical properties across large areas. Complementary use of GPR with CPT can enhance site investigation procedures for the development of polar infrastructure.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleQuantitative Comparison of Cone Penetration Testing Tip Resistance Data with Ground-Penetrating Radar Amplitude Data
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume34
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Cold Regions Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000206
dc.page04020003
dc.treeJournal of Cold Regions Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record