• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Applying Derived Distribution Method to Microlevel Driving Behavior Characteristics to Quantify Uncertainties in Traffic Stream Flow and Density

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    AJRUA6.0001037.pdf (1.367Mb)
    Date
    2020
    Author
    Caleb Ronald Munigety
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The flows and densities of traffic streams play an important role in defining the performance of roadways and corresponding improvement strategies. Traffic flows and densities are the outcome of complex psychophysical actions of drivers. Actions performed by the drivers while driving can be quantified in terms of the headway and/or spacing that they maintain with respect to the vehicles they follow. However, the inherent randomness that exists in human driving behaviors results in random headway and spacing, which leads to uncertainties in predicted traffic flows and densities. As a result, it is important to quantify these uncertainties, because they play an important role in proposing improvement strategies. In this study, a derived distribution method–based uncertainty quantification of traffic flows and densities is proposed; it involves the modification of deterministic flow–headway and density–spacing relationships into probabilistic ones. Analytical expressions were derived for the probability distributions of flows and densities, given the headway and spacing distributions, respectively, which are conditional on velocities. The estimation of the distribution parameters and the validation of the proposed approach were carried out using the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) trajectory dataset. The results indicated that the proposed analytical distribution models represented empirical field observations quite accurately.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264791
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV