• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Probabilistic Risk Management Framework for Tolerance-Related Issues in Modularized Projects: Local and Global Perspectives

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    AJRUA6.0001036.pdf (2.627Mb)
    Date
    2020
    Author
    Mohammed S. A. Enshassi
    Scott Walbridge
    Jeffrey S. West
    Carl T. Haas
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Modular components and assemblies involve complex geometric relationships whereby excessive geometric variability in a critical component can affect the overall geometry of the aggregated and assembled structure onsite. These unique geometric relationships can expose modular projects to a number of related risks that propagate from one to another by means of escalation phenomena. Improper assessment and reactive management of these related risks typically results in extensive site-fit rework, cost overruns, schedule delays, and quality issues. Current modularization practices and previously developed risk management frameworks/toolkits lack a practical methodology for quantitatively evaluating the unique relationships among tolerance-related risks and for proactively managing their impact. These considerations motivated the research introduced in this paper: the development of a framework for the holistic assessment and efficient management of excessive geometric variability risks in modular construction projects. In the framework presented here, a classical risk assessment technique, in which a probability-impact risk model is employed for evaluating risks individually from a local perspective, is linked with an innovative technique for considering interactions among risks from a global perspective, which employs the concepts of a design structure matrix and pairwise comparisons using the analytical hierarchy process. The results of a case study conducted for validation purposes demonstrate that the developed framework can provide industry practitioners (owners, designers, fabricators, and contractors) with a better understanding of the risk profile for a project as well as new insights into the development of proactive mitigation strategies from both a local and a global perspective.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264789
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV