Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAdams-Selin, Rebecca D.
dc.contributor.authorClark, Adam J.
dc.contributor.authorMelick, Christopher J.
dc.contributor.authorDembek, Scott R.
dc.contributor.authorJirak, Israel L.
dc.contributor.authorZiegler, Conrad L.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-22T09:02:52Z
dc.date.available2019-09-22T09:02:52Z
dc.date.copyright11/20/2018 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.otherWAF-D-18-0024.1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4262484
dc.description.abstractFour different versions of the HAILCAST hail model have been tested as part of the 2014?16 NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed (HWT) Spring Forecasting Experiments. HAILCAST was run as part of the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) WRF Ensemble during 2014?16 and the Community Leveraged Unified Ensemble (CLUE) in 2016. Objective verification using the Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor maximum expected size of hail (MRMS MESH) product was conducted using both object-based and neighborhood grid-based verification. Subjective verification and feedback was provided by HWT participants. Hourly maximum storm surrogate fields at a variety of thresholds and Storm Prediction Center (SPC) convective outlooks were also evaluated for comparison. HAILCAST was found to improve with each version due to feedback from the 2014?16 HWTs. The 2016 version of HAILCAST was equivalent to or exceeded the skill of the tested storm surrogates across a variety of thresholds. The post-2016 version of HAILCAST was found to improve 50-mm hail forecasts through object-based verification, but 25-mm hail forecasting ability declined as measured through neighborhood grid-based verification. The skill of the storm surrogate fields varied widely as the threshold values used to determine hail size were varied. HAILCAST was found not to require such tuning, as it produced consistent results even when used across different model configurations and horizontal grid spacings. Additionally, different storm surrogate fields performed at varying levels of skill when forecasting 25- versus 50-mm hail, hinting at the different convective modes typically associated with small versus large sizes of hail. HAILCAST was able to match results relatively consistently with the best-performing storm surrogate field across multiple hail size thresholds.
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titleEvolution of WRF-HAILCAST during the 2014–16 NOAA/Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiments
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume34
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleWeather and Forecasting
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/WAF-D-18-0024.1
dc.journal.fristpage61
dc.journal.lastpage79
dc.treeWeather and Forecasting:;2018:;volume 034:;issue 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record