• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    An Evaluation of Clouds and Precipitation in Convection-Permitting Forecasts for South Africa

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    WAF-D-18-0080.1.pdf (3.998Mb)
    Date
    2019
    Author
    Stein, T. H. M.
    Keat, W.
    Maidment, R. I.
    Landman, S.
    Becker, E.
    Boyd, D. F. A.
    Bodas-Salcedo, A.
    Pankiewicz, G.
    Webster, S.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Since 2016, the South African Weather Service (SAWS) has been running convective-scale simulations to assist with forecast operations across southern Africa. These simulations are run with a tropical configuration of the Met Office Unified Model (UM), nested in the Met Office global model, but without data assimilation. For November 2016, convection-permitting simulations at 4.4- and 1.5-km grid lengths are compared against a simulation at 10-km grid length with convection parameterization (the current UM global atmosphere configuration) to identify the benefits of increasing model resolution for forecasting convection across southern Africa. The simulations are evaluated against satellite rainfall estimates, CloudSat vertical cloud profiles, and SAWS radar data. In line with previous studies using the UM, on a monthly time scale, the diurnal cycle of convection and the distribution of rainfall rates compare better against observations when convection-permitting model configurations are used. The SAWS radar network provides a three-dimensional composite of radar reflectivity for northeast South Africa at 6-min intervals, allowing the evaluation of the vertical development of precipitating clouds and of the timing of the onset of deep convection. Analysis of four case study days indicates that the 4.4-km simulations have a later onset of convection than the 1.5-km simulations, but there is no consistent bias of the simulations against the radar observations across the case studies.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4262473
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV