• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Validation of GMI Snowfall Observations by Using a Combination of Weather Radar and Surface Measurements

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    jamc-d-17-0176.1.pdf (5.714Mb)
    Date
    2017
    Author
    von Lerber, Annakaisa
    Moisseev, Dmitri
    Marks, David A.
    Petersen, Walter
    Harri, Ari-Matti
    Chandrasekar, V.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    AbstractCurrently, there are several spaceborne microwave instruments suitable for the detection and quantitative estimation of snowfall. To test and improve retrieval snowfall algorithms, ground validation datasets that combine detailed characterization of snowfall microphysics and spatial precipitation measurements are required. To this endpoint, measurements of snow microphysics are combined with large-scale weather radar observations to generate such a dataset. The quantitative snowfall estimates are computed by applying event-specific relations between the equivalent reflectivity factor and snowfall rate to weather radar observations. The relations are derived using retrieved ice particle microphysical properties from observations that were carried out at the University of Helsinki research station in Hyytiälä, Finland, which is about 64 km east of the radar. For each event, the uncertainties of the estimate are also determined. The feasibility of using this type of data to validate spaceborne snowfall measurements and algorithms is demonstrated with the NASA GPM Microwave Imager (GMI) snowfall product. The detection skill and retrieved surface snowfall precipitation of the GPROF detection algorithm, versions V04A and V05A, are assessed over southern Finland. On the basis of the 26 studied overpasses, probability of detection (POD) is 0.90 for version V04A and 0.84 for version V05A, and corresponding false-alarm rates are 0.09 and 0.10, respectively. A clear dependence of detection skill on cloud echo top height is shown: POD increased from 0.8 to 0.99 (V04A) and from 0.61 to 0.94 (V05A) as the cloud echo top altitude increased from 2 to 5 km. Both versions underestimate the snowfall rate by factors of 6 (V04A) and 3 (V05A).
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261609
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV