• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Dual-Polarization Radar Rainfall Estimation over Tropical Oceans

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    jamc-d-17-0160.1.pdf (2.584Mb)
    Date
    2017
    Author
    Thompson, Elizabeth J.
    Rutledge, Steven A.
    Dolan, Brenda
    Thurai, Merhala
    Chandrasekar, V.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    AbstractDual-polarization radar rainfall estimation relationships have been extensively tested in continental and subtropical coastal rain regimes, with little testing over tropical oceans where the majority of rain on Earth occurs. A 1.5-yr Indo-Pacific warm pool disdrometer dataset was used to quantify the impacts of tropical oceanic drop-size distribution (DSD) variability on dual-polarization radar variables and their resulting utility for rainfall estimation. Variables that were analyzed include differential reflectivity Zdr; specific differential phase Kdp; reflectivity Zh; and specific attenuation Ah. When compared with continental or coastal convection, tropical oceanic Zdr and Kdp values were more often of low magnitude (<0.5 dB, <0.3° km?1) and Zdr was lower for a given Kdp or Zh, consistent with observations of tropical oceanic DSDs being dominated by numerous, small, less-oblate drops. New X-, C-, and S-band R estimators were derived: R(Kdp), R(Ah), R(Kdp, ?dr), R(z, ?dr), and R(Ah, ?dr), which use linear versions of Zdr and Zh, namely ?dr and z. Except for R(Kdp), convective/stratiform partitioning was unnecessary for these estimators. All dual-polarization estimators outperformed updated R(z) estimators derived from the same dataset. The best-performing estimator was R(Kdp, ?dr), followed by R(Ah, ?dr) and R(z, ?dr). The R error was further reduced in an updated blended algorithm choosing between R(z), R(z, ?dr), R(Kdp), and R(Kdp, ?dr) depending on Zdr > 0.25 dB and Kdp > 0.3° km?1 thresholds. Because of these thresholds and the lack of hail, R(Kdp) was never used. At all wavelengths, R(z) was still needed 43% of the time during light rain (R < 5 mm h?1, Zdr < 0.25 dB), composing 7% of the total rain volume. As wavelength decreased, R(Kdp, ?dr) was used more often, R(z, ?dr) was used less often, and the blended algorithm became increasingly more accurate than R(z).
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261601
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV