Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiller, Benjamin M.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-19T10:05:40Z
dc.date.available2019-09-19T10:05:40Z
dc.date.copyright10/9/2017 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.otherwcas-d-16-0093.1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261450
dc.description.abstractAbstract Knowing the benefits of creating or expanding programs is important for determining optimal levels of investment. Yet estimates of the benefits of weather warning systems are sparse, perhaps because there is often no clear counterfactual of how individuals would have fared without a particular warning system. This paper enriches the literature and informs policy decisions by using conditional variation in the initial broadcast dates of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration?s Weather Radio All Hazards (NWR) transmitters to produce both cross-sectional and fixed effects estimates of the causal impact of expanding the NWR transmitter network. Results suggest that from 1970 to 2014, expanding NWR coverage to a previously untreated county was associated with an almost 40% reduction in injuries and as much as a 50% reduction in fatalities. The benefits associated with further expansion of this system have likely declined over time.
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titleThe Not-So-Marginal Value of Weather Warning Systems
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume10
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleWeather, Climate, and Society
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0093.1
dc.journal.fristpage89
dc.journal.lastpage101
dc.treeWeather, Climate, and Society:;2017:;volume 010:;issue 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record