Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlfaro, Diego A.
dc.contributor.authorConiglio, Michael C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-19T10:05:13Z
dc.date.available2019-09-19T10:05:13Z
dc.date.copyright11/10/2017 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.otherwaf-d-17-0088.1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4261364
dc.description.abstractAbstractThe environmental factors that drive the dissipation of linear severe-wind-producing mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) are investigated. Layer-lifting indices are emphasized, which measure convective instability in forward-propagating MCSs by considering that deep convective latent heating depends on 1) the potential latent heating within the atmospheric column, measured by the integrated CAPE (ICAPE), and 2) the dilution of buoyancy due to midtropospheric inflow, measured by the inflow fraction (IF) of convectively unstable air to total system-relative inflow. These elements are integrated to define the layer-lifting CAPE (CAPEll), which depends on environmental thermodynamics, kinematics, and the MCS?s movement vector. Radar reflectivity plots are used to subjectively identify and classify MCSs in terms of their stage (mature or dissipating) and degree of organization (highly or weakly organized). Nonparametric statistical inferences are performed on several metrics computed at maturity and dissipation from RUC/RAP analysis data, aiming to identify the most skillful indices for diagnosing three different aspects of MCS dissipation: 1) the transition from maturity to dissipation, 2) the stage of an MCS, and 3) the disorganization that characterizes the dissipating stage. In terms of MCS dissipation CAPEll is the best diagnostic. A close approximation to CAPEll is accomplished by estimating an MCS?s movement with Corfidi vectors, providing a potentially useful index in operational settings. ICAPE is the most skillful thermodynamic metric, while IF is the best kinematic discriminator of MCS stage and stage transition, suggesting the fundamental importance of layer-lifting convective instability for MCS maintenance. Layer-lifting indices are not particularly skillful at distinguishing the degree of MCS organization at maturity, which is best diagnosed by deep vertical wind shear.
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
dc.titleDiscrimination of Mature and Dissipating Severe-Wind-Producing MCSs with Layer-Lifting Indices
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume33
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleWeather and Forecasting
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/WAF-D-17-0088.1
dc.journal.fristpage3
dc.journal.lastpage21
dc.treeWeather and Forecasting:;2017:;volume 033:;issue 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record