Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPekka Leviäkangas
dc.contributor.authorFarzad Pargar
dc.contributor.authorKonsta Sirvio
dc.contributor.authorBehrouz Khabbaz Beheshti
dc.contributor.authorPeter E. D. Love
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-18T10:42:50Z
dc.date.available2019-09-18T10:42:50Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29IS.1943-555X.0000497.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260608
dc.description.abstractAsset management is a strategic tool for maintaining the value of an asset at a level that is satisfactory for users, asset owners, and taxpayers. This paper introduces the concept of service value. The concept is applied following the recommendations of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): service value equals the value of economic benefits generated by an asset. It is shown how alternative value accounting methods result in different asset values. The present value method, as recommended by accounting practitioners and in line with the concept of service value, is more appropriate for asset management purposes than the perpetual inventory method (PIM), despite the fact that the latter is more widely used. The impact of correct asset and service value accounting extends well beyond project and investment program management levels to the national accounting system of fixed capital. Incorrect asset management accounting may lead to serious under- or overestimation of investments and repair debt.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleService Value and Componentized Accounting of Infrastructure Assets
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume25
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000497
dc.page04019025
dc.treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2019:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record