• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Assessment of Artificial Intelligence–Based Models and Metaheuristic Algorithms in Modeling Evaporation

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001835.pdf (1.549Mb)
    Date
    2019
    Author
    Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani
    Ozgur Kisi
    Jamshid Piri
    Amin Mahdavi-Meymand
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Evaporation (Ep) has a vital importance for the management and development of water resources projects. In this study two scenarios are considered in prediction of monthly pan evaporation. The first scenario challenges the ability of three artificial intelligence–based models [neural network autoregressive with exogenous input (NNARX), gene expression programming (GEP), and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)]. The second scenario investigates the capability of five different metaheuristic algorithms [particle swarm optimization (PSO), firefly algorithm (FA), artificial bee colony (ABC), continuous ant colony optimization (CACO), and genetic algorithm (GA)] integrated with the ANFIS model in Ep modeling. Meteorological factors (monthly air temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity, and wind speed data) of two stations in Turkey were used as inputs to the models. Various statistic measures [root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and determination coefficient (R2)] and diagnostic analysis (Taylor diagram) were deployed to evaluate and compare the performance of the models. The results of the first scenario show that the ANFIS model gave better performance in Gaziantep Station, whereas the NNARX model performed better in estimating Ep values in Adiyaman Station. In the second scenario, it was observed that the PSO and GA algorithms performed better in comparison to the other algorithms in Gaziantep and Adiyaman stations, respectively. The non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test denoted that there is a significant difference (alpha of 0.05) between the observed versus predicted amounts of monthly Ep for the NNARX, ANFIS, and GEP. However, there is no sign of significant difference in predicting monthly Ep between the applied metaheuristic algorithms.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260543
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV