• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Soil–Structure Interaction Effects in Offshore Wind Support Structures Under Seismic Loading

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    omae_141_6_061903.pdf (1.892Mb)
    Date
    2019
    Author
    Gelagoti, Fani M.
    Kourkoulis, Rallis S.
    Georgiou, Irene A.
    Karamanos, Spyros A.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This paper explores the performance of a 10 MW offshore wind turbine (OWT) supported either on a large diameter monopile or a 4-legged jacket emphasizing on the nonlinear response of its belowseabed foundation. The seabed foundation alternatives, a monopile and a multipod foundation, are compared under monotonic, cyclic, and seismic loading. For all nonseismic scenarios considered, the monopile is more flexible than the jacket and transmits higher rotations at the OWT base. The differences between the two alternatives are amplified in the case of nonsymmetric cyclic loading; the monopile not only deforms more than the jacket but tends to accumulate irrecoverable rotation with increasing loading cycles. The seismic performance of the alternative support structures is assessed for a comprehensive set of earthquake motions. It is concluded that both systems are seismically robust especially when subjected to pure earthquake loading, neglecting the simultaneous action of wind and waves. Alarming issues for OWT performance may arise when a nonzero steady wind force is superimposed to the kinematically induced stressing of the seabed foundation due to the seismic wave action. Jacket legs settle unevenly, while monopiles are building up rotations at increasing rates. Assuming a design-level earthquake and a wind thrust of the order 60% of the NC wind loading amplitude, this seismically induced residual rotation for the monopile may often exceed the deformation tolerance criterion. For the same loading combination, the corresponding rotation of the Jacket installation remains safely within the prescribed limits.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4259300
    Collections
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV