• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Identification of the Velocity, Thickness, and Interfacial Roughness of Coating Using Full Time-Domain URCPS: Cross-Correlation-Based Inverse Problem

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    nde_002_01_011008.pdf (3.377Mb)
    Date
    2019
    Author
    Ma, Zhiyuan
    Lin, Li
    Jin, Shijie
    Lei, Mingkai
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Aiming at characterizing interfacial roughness of thin coatings with unknown sound velocity and thickness, we derive a full time-domain ultrasonic reflection coefficient phase spectrum (URCPS) as a function of interfacial roughness based on the phase screen approximation theory. The constructed URCPS is used to determine the velocity, thickness, and interfacial roughness of specimens through the cross-correlation algorithm. The effect of detection frequency on the roughness measurement is investigated through the finite element method. A series of simulations were implemented on Ni-coating specimens with a thickness of 400 μm and interfacial roughness of 1.9–39.8 μm. Simulation results indicated that the measurement errors of interfacial roughness were less than 10% when the roughness satisfies the relationship of Rq = 1.6–10.0%λ. The measured velocity and thicknesses were in good agreement with those imported in simulation models with less than 9.3% error. Ultrasonic experiments were carried out on two Ni-coating specimens through a flat transducer with an optimized frequency of 15 MHz. Compared with the velocities measured by time-of-flight (TOF) method, the relative errors of inversed velocities were all less than 10%. The inversed thicknesses were in good agreement with those observed by optical microscopy with less than 10.9% and 7.6% error. The averaged interfacial roughness determined by the ultrasonic inversion method was 16.9 μm and 30.7 μm, respectively. The relative errors were 5.1% and 2.0% between ultrasonic and confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) method, respectively.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4257643
    Collections
    • Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV