Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSolbiati, Monica
dc.contributor.authorTrombetta, Lucia
dc.contributor.authorSacco, Roberto M.
dc.contributor.authorErba, Luca
dc.contributor.authorBozzano, Viviana
dc.contributor.authorCostantino, Giorgio
dc.contributor.authorRaj, Satish R.
dc.contributor.authorBarbic, Franca
dc.contributor.authorCasazza, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorDipaola, Franca
dc.contributor.authorFurlan, Raffaello
dc.contributor.authorKenny, Rose A.
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, James V.
dc.contributor.authorSheldon, Robert S.
dc.contributor.authorShen, Win
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-08T09:28:57Z
dc.date.available2019-06-08T09:28:57Z
dc.date.copyright3/6/2019 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1932-6181
dc.identifier.othermed_013_02_024001.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4257638
dc.description.abstractThe aims of this study were (1) to identify research publications studying noninvasive electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring devices, (2) to define and categorize current technology in noninvasive ECG recording, and (3) to discuss desirable noninvasive recording features for personalized syncope evaluation to guide technological advancement and future studies. We performed a systematic review of the literature that assessed noninvasive ECG-monitoring devices, regardless of the reason for monitoring. We performed an Internet search and corresponded with syncope experts and companies to help identify further eligible products. We extracted information about included studies and device features. We found 173 relevant papers. The main reasons for ECG monitoring were atrial fibrillation (n = 45), coronary artery disease (n = 10), syncope (n = 8), palpitations (n = 8), other cardiac diseases (n = 67), and technological aspects of monitoring (n = 35). We identified 198 devices: 5 hospital telemetry devices, 12 patches, 46 event recorders, 70 Holter monitors, 23 external loop recorders, 20 mobile cardiac outpatient telemetries, and 22 multifunctional devices. The features of each device were very heterogeneous. There are a large number of ECG-monitoring devices with different features available in the market. Our findings may help clinicians select the appropriate device for their patients. Since there are only a few published articles analyzing their usefulness in syncope patients, further research might improve their use in this clinical setting.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleA Systematic Review of Noninvasive Electrocardiogram Monitoring Devices for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiovascular Syncope
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume13
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Medical Devices
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4042795
dc.journal.fristpage24001
dc.journal.lastpage024001-10
dc.treeJournal of Medical Devices:;2019:;volume( 013 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record