Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGu, Qimei
dc.contributor.authorJoglekar, Tejashree
dc.contributor.authorBieberich, Charles
dc.contributor.authorMa, Ronghui
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Liang
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-17T11:18:40Z
dc.date.available2019-03-17T11:18:40Z
dc.date.copyright1/14/2019 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0022-1481
dc.identifier.otherht_141_03_032402.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4256884
dc.description.abstractIn magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia, a required thermal dosage for tumor destruction greatly depends on nanoparticle distribution in tumors. The objective of this study is to conduct in vivo experiments to evaluate whether local heating using magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia changes nanoparticle concentration distribution in prostatic cancer (PC3) tumors. In vivo animal experiments were performed on grafted PC3 tumors implanted in mice to investigate whether local heating via exposing the tumor to an alternating magnetic field (5 kA/m and 192 kHz) for 25 min resulted in nanoparticle spreading from the intratumoral injection site to tumor periphery. Nanoparticle redistribution due to local heating is evaluated via comparing microCT images of resected tumors after heating to those in the control group without heating. A previously determined calibration relationship between microCT Hounsfield unit (HU) values and local nanoparticle concentrations in the tumors was used to determine the distribution of volumetric heat generation rate (q‴MNH) when the nanoparticles were subject to the alternating magnetic field. sas,matlab, and excel were used to process the scanned data to determine the total heat generation rate and the nanoparticle distribution volumes in individual HU ranges. Compared to the tumors in the control group, nanoparticles in the tumors in the heating group occupied not only the vicinity of the injection site, but also tumor periphery. The nanoparticle distribution volume in the high q‴MNH range (>1.8 × 106 W/m3) is 10% smaller in the heating group, while in the low q‴MNH range of 0.6–1.8 × 106 W/m3, it is 95% larger in the heating group. Based on the calculated heat generation rate in individual HU ranges, the percentage in the HU range larger than 2000 decreases significantly from 46% in the control group to 32% in the heating group, while the percentages in the HU ranges of 500–1000 and 1000–1500 in the heating group are much higher than that in the control group. Heating PC3 tumors for 25 min resulted in significant nanoparticle migration from high concentration regions to low concentration regions in the tumors. The volumetric heat generation rate distribution based on nanoparticle distribution before or after local heating can be used in the future to guide simulation of nanoparticle redistribution and its induced temperature rise in PC3 tumors during magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia, therefore, accurately predicting required thermal dosage for safe and effective thermal therapy.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleNanoparticle Redistribution in PC3 Tumors Induced by Local Heating in Magnetic Nanoparticle Hyperthermia: In Vivo Experimental Study
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume141
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Heat Transfer
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4042298
dc.journal.fristpage32402
dc.journal.lastpage032402-9
dc.treeJournal of Heat Transfer:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record