Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCallejo, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorDopico, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-17T11:09:19Z
dc.date.available2019-03-17T11:09:19Z
dc.date.copyright1/7/2019 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1555-1415
dc.identifier.othercnd_014_02_021004.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4256743
dc.description.abstractAlgorithms for the sensitivity analysis of multibody systems are quickly maturing as computational and software resources grow. Indeed, the area has made substantial progress since the first academic methods and examples were developed. Today, sensitivity analysis tools aimed at gradient-based design optimization are required to be as computationally efficient and scalable as possible. This paper presents extensive verification of one of the most popular sensitivity analysis techniques, namely the direct differentiation method (DDM). Usage of such method is recommended when the number of design parameters relative to the number of outputs is small and when the time integration algorithm is sensitive to accumulation errors. Verification is hereby accomplished through two radically different computational techniques, namely manual differentiation and automatic differentiation, which are used to compute the necessary partial derivatives. Experiments are conducted on an 18-degree-of-freedom, 366-dependent-coordinate bus model with realistic geometry and tire contact forces, which constitutes an unusually large system within general-purpose sensitivity analysis of multibody systems. The results are in good agreement; the manual technique provides shorter runtimes, whereas the automatic differentiation technique is easier to implement. The presented results highlight the potential of manual and automatic differentiation approaches within general-purpose simulation packages, and the importance of formulation benchmarking.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleDirect Sensitivity Analysis of Multibody Systems: A Vehicle Dynamics Benchmark
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume14
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4041960
dc.journal.fristpage21004
dc.journal.lastpage021004-9
dc.treeJournal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics:;2019:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record