Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorvan Hove, Alouette
dc.contributor.authorSkov, Lasse N.
dc.contributor.authorHinz, Denis F.
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-17T10:23:55Z
dc.date.available2019-03-17T10:23:55Z
dc.date.copyright6/18/2018 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2377-2158
dc.identifier.othervvuq_003_01_011002.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4256112
dc.description.abstractAchieving good reproducibility in fluid flow experiments can be challenging, in particular in scenarios where the experimental boundary conditions are obscure. We use computational uncertainty quantification (UQ) to evaluate the influence of uncertain inflow conditions on the reproducibility of experiments with swirling flow. Using a nonintrusive polynomial chaos method in combination with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code, we obtain the expectation and variance of the velocity fields downstream from symmetric and asymmetric swirl disturbance generators. Our results suggest that the flow patterns downstream from the asymmetric swirl disturbance generator are more reproducible than the flow patterns downstream from the symmetric swirl disturbance generator. This confirms that the inherent breaking of symmetry eliminates instability mechanisms in the wake of the disturber, thereby creating more stable swirling patterns that make the experiments more reproducible.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleReproducibility of Experiments With Swirling Flow: Numerical Prediction With Polynomial Chaos
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume3
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4040431
dc.journal.fristpage11002
dc.journal.lastpage011002-12
dc.treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2019:;volume( 003 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record